The media have the power to construct
opinions of certain segments of society.
Crime reports within the media embody this omnipotent role, dictating
the way in which the public react to and perceive victims of crime (Marsh; Meville, 2009, p.101). Victims of crime
as represented by media reports, are defined under one of two categories,
deserving or undeserving (Marsh et al. 2009, p.104).
Taking the science of positivist
victiminolgy (Marsh et al. 2009, p. 104-105) and Christie’s ideal victim (1986), the media create positive sentiments of deserving
victims as those who are fearful and vulnerable to an unforeseeable sequence of
criminal events (Marsh et
al. 2009, p.101). Deserving victims stereotypically
appeal to public values and sentiments. It is for this reason that the most
defenceless and gruesome descriptions of victims are seen to be a profitable
commodity by the media (Marsh et al. 2009, p. 104-105).
A really great example of this
deserving victim model is the portrayal, within the media, of elderly victims. Twenty-first
century society is one of which traditional cultural familial ties and
obligations have been broken and disregarded, where the elderly are seen to be
a burden. No longer are we a society who take care of the elderly population,
but rather a population who leave this responsibility onto retirement homes and
government pensioner payments to take care of. Essentially making the elderly
seem especially vulnerable and therefore ensuing guilt and insecurity within
the public (Cheliotis, 2010, p. 170-171).
The media feed off this remorse and allow society to condemn those who
so blatantly, to the extremities of crime, conform to societal practises
(Cheliotis, 2010, p. 171, 174). In
essence we are passing on the bla me to a more serious and criminalised
disregard, by deviant persons named, in an effort to feel better about our own
disrespectful practises towards the elderly. Most crime reports, portray
the elderly as completely helpless and volatile victims, who due to their
deteriorating health and age, are unable to stop and/or prevent any violent
assault and larceny crimes from happening to them (Cheliotis, 2010, p.
174).
| Terry White,73, and Graham Law,64 (Wilsion, 2014) |
| Terry White,73, and Graham Law,64 (Wilsion, 2014) |
I recently read a
sunshine coast daily newspaper article that used this idea. The article
titled, Grub who did this could be out in less than a year,
reports a vicious assault in which two men aged in their sixties and seventies,
were at the mercy of a violent and heavily intoxicated twenty five year old
male (Wilsion,
2014, p. 1). The two enjoying a quite drink at a local pub,
were attacked because they were deemed, by the male in question, “too old” to
be at the Victory Hotel (Wilsion,
2014, p. 1). Ghastly images of the two elderly men as
well as CCTV footage of the attack presented within the article, highlighted
the complete disrespect of the young man towards the two elderly victims (Wilsion, 2014, p. 1). This
article is just one example of the overwhelm number of crime reports which
allows society to publically shame individuals who are simply conforming,
although in a more severe way, to the all too common lack of respect ensued
upon the elderly within contemporary society (Wilsion, 2014, p. 1).
Those who don’t’ fit this
deserving victim model are identified as underserving victims of crime. These
statistically overrepresented population of victims, yet demonised within the
media, are on a regular basis faced with a predetermined sequence of criminal
events (Marsh; Meville, 2009, p.102). These individuals are
then represented within crime reports, as numbed to their circumstances and
therefore in some shape or form, contributing to their own victimisation (Marsh
et al. 2009, p.102). Which through media influence, exposes these individuals
to a criminalised status and/or secondary victimisation.
| (Bachelard, 2013) |
A contemporary example of a media-deemed
underserving victim of crime is asylum seekers (Marsh et al. 2009, p.113). Ask yourself how are the images of the asylum
seekers above any different to the ones of the two elderly victims listed
previously? Why are they deemed underserving victims?
The answer…. THE REPRESENTATION OF
ASYLUM SEEKERS IN THE MEDIA
‘
Boat People’, ‘Queue Jumpers’,
‘Aliens’ and ‘Terrorists’ are terms
which have been used by the global media to describe a global population
of underserving victims who a merely fulfilling their inalienable human right
to seek a better life. The News of the
World headline on the 30th of January (2005) “HALT THIS CROOKED
TIDE” (as cited in Marsh et al. 2009, p. 115), is just one example of how the an
unsympathetically media representation utilise negative, value loaded imagery
to define asylum seekers as criminals and therefore underserving victims (Marsh
et al. 2009, p. 115-116).
It can therefore be understood the
immense power that the media have in influencing and therefore establishing the
way in which society perceive deserving and undeserving victims of crime (Marsh
et al. 2009, p.101).
References
- Bachelard, M (2013), ‘Unrest
grows over large asylum seeker numbers’, Sdyney Morning Herald, 13th
July, p. 1, available at http://www.smh.com.au/world/unrest-grows-over-large-asylum-seeker-numbers-20130712-2pvkj.html
- Cheliotis, L. K. (2010) ‘The ambivalent consequences of visibility: Crime and prisons in the mass media’, Crime Media Culture, 6:2, p. 169-180
- Christie, N. (1986). The Ideal Victim. In E. Fattah (ed), From Crime Policy to Victim Policy. London: Macmillan
- Marsh, I; Meville, G. (2009). Crimes, Justice and the Media, 1st
edi. London: Routledge
- Solomon, E (2005) ‘Is the Press the Real Power Behind Punitivism?’, Criminal Justice Matters, 59:1, p. 34-35
- Wilsion, R (2014), ‘Video shows horrifying attack on elderly cancer patient’, Sunshine Coast Daily,2nd May, p. 1, available at http://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/news/video-shows-horrifying-attack-elderly-hervey-bay-m/2247076/
Well considered and presented piece Dearna. A thoughtful reflection on victim status using a number of examples to demonstrate the ways in which some victims are more visible in the media than others. Thanks for your insightful posts.
ReplyDeleteAlyce